Legal Opinion

Buro v. American Petroleum Transport Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 29, 1948No. Civ. 7460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

The defendant, American Petroleum Transport Corp., has moved for a summary judgment pursuant to the provisions of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

On January 6, 1944 the S. S. William Penn docked at a pier near the foot, of 125th Street in the Hudson River in the City oí New York. The plaintiff was employed by the impleaded third-party defendant. It is alleged that the plaintiff was on the ship on the morning in question, and while engaged in his work he slipped and fell through an opening of one of the tanks. It is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Cullings v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Caldarola v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Militano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGowan v. J. H. Winchester & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Mercado v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  3. Militano v. States Marine Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API