Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peerson v. Ashcraft Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1917No. 8 Div. 29Published

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; C. P. Almon, Judge. Action by J. M. Peerson against tbe Ash-craft Cotton Mills and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Dissent

McCLELLAN, j.

(dissenting). This is an action for damages instituted by the appellant against the appellees. The demurrer of the defendants being sustained, the plaintiff took a nonsuit because of the adverse ruling thus made.

Omitting only the formal parts, the single count of the complaint is in these words:

“That defendants, maliciously and without probable cause, and for the purpose of damaging and harassing plaintiff, procured a bill of complaint- to be filed against plaintiff in the chancery court of Lauderdale county, Ala., on the 8th day of March, 1912, the style of said cause being W.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sparks v. McCrearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Zavello v. Reeves & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Reynolds v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API