Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Burke

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1933No. 14399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

Plaintiff, a landlord, alleges that defendant, a tenant, failed to pay one of the rent notes at its maturity, and that thus the remaining notes for the unexpired term of the lease became due. Defendant contends that, by express agreement previously made, the date on which the .rent notes were to be paid was fixed as the 15th day of each month, instead of as originally set forth in the lease. The suit now before us was filed on the 19th of the month; the rent note which was due on the first not having been paid up to the time of the filing of the suit.

Even if defendant’s contention be correct—…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard Brewing Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Briede v. BabstSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Maestri v. NallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Falco v. GilbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Swayze v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Himbola Manor Apartments v. AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Box v. BoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Credeur v. Credeur Credit Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Jackson v. McKeanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API