Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 10, 1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The case is stated by Judge Moncure in his opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Moncure, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the Hustings-court of the city of Richmond, convicting the plaintiff in error, Mahala Johnson, of grand larceny, and sentencing her to confinement in the penitentiary for five years. The offence for which she was prosecuted is declared by the Code, chapter 192, section 14, as amended and re*556enacted, first by the act passed February 20, 1866, Acts of 1865-6, p. 89, chap. 23, and again by the act passed March 1, 1867, acts of 1866-67, p. 709, chap. 283, which is in these words:

“ § 14. If any person steal from…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fay v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
  2. Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API