Legal Opinion

People v. Sweet

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1937No. Crim. 1929PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The defendant was convicted of an attempt to commit the felony denounced by section 288a of the Penal Code, and he has appealed.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not questioned, nor are any of the rulings made during the course of the trial assigned as error. The points urged for reversal arise out of the proceedings had at the time of the pronouncement of judgment. In this connection the record shows that at the time defendant was first arraigned on the charge, he appeared with counsel of his own selection, entered a plea of not guilty, and waived a trial by jury.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. People v. HooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Shakin v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Neblett v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Pac. & Sw. Annual Conference of United Methodist Church v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API