Legal Opinion

American Diamond Rock-Boring Co. v. Sheldon

United States Circuit Court

Decided December 9, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

These causes have been reheard, pursuant to the granting of the motion for that purpose. 24 Fed. Rep. 374. It still appears that Leschot made a valuable invention, which he patented in original letter No. 89,235, dated July 14,1863, the substance and principle of which the defendants have made use of, as has been be*769foro held in these eases. 17 Blatchf. 208, 303; 2 Fed. Rep. 353. The patent was reissued in No. 2,609, dated October 26, 1869, to his assignee. The material question now is whether the reissue, or any part of it, is valid to cover tiiis infringement.

The original had a single claim…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gage v. HerringSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1879
  2. Cleveland Trust Co. v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API