Legal Opinion
Hambleton v. Duhain
California Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1886No. 11513PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This was an action to quiet title to certain lands which the plaintiff claimed to have acquired, mediately through various conveyances, from the state of California, by its patent.
*137The cause was tried by the court, a jury having been expressly waived. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and from that and an order denying the defendants a now trial, they have appealed. The findings of fact are as follows: —
“ 1. That the tract of land in dispute, to wit, the southeast quarter and the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section 1, and the northeast quarter of the northwest…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McBrown v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Martin v. DurandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by3 opinions
- Daniels v. Gualala Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. McKeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Russell v. HackingUtah Supreme Court · 1934