Legal Opinion · Dissent

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Paul J. Bieber

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 7, 2012No. 12–1203Published

1DissentWiggins, Justice

It is almost axiomatic that we revoke the license of a lawyer who steals. Comm. on *531Prof'l Ethics & Conduct v. Ottesen, 525 N.W.2d 865, 866 (Iowa 1994). There is no place in our profession for an attorney who steals funds from another. Iowa Supreme Ct. Bd. of Prof'l Ethics & Conduct v. Bell, 650 N.W.2d 648, 652 (Iowa 2002). Dishonesty is a trait that disqualifies a person from the practice of law. Iowa Supreme Ct. Bd. of Prof'l Ethics & Conduct v. Irwin, 679 N.W.2d 641, 644 (Iowa 2004).

We have an obligation to protect the public from theft and deceit. Bell, 650 N.W.2d at 652. When a theft…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. D'AngeloSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API