Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Graves

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division óf the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 12, 1919, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict. The action was to recover for services in pressing and baling certain hay owned by the defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division óf the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 12, 1919, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict. The action was to recover for services in pressing and baling certain hay owned by the defendant. The defendant on the trial claimed that the plaintiffs had failed to comply with section 253 of the General Business Law in that they had failed to tag the hay as required by that law. Plaintiffs contended that the hay was not pressed for market and that the defendant agreed to…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Covaleski v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API