Legal Opinion
Peet v. Colvin
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 23, 2015No. Civil No. 13-851(DSD)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the pro se motions to show cause by plaintiff John E. Peet.1 On April 12, 2013, Peet filed a complaint seeking judicial review of a decision by defendant Carolyn Colvin, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), denying him social security benefits. On July 23, 2013, the court remanded the case to the Commissioner for a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), because the record of Peet’s January 22, 2008, hearing was blank. ECF No. 12. The Commissioner stated that a new decision…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sharon Travis v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Tanya Buckner v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Acevedo Ex Rel. J.A. v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007