Legal Opinion

Prestwood v. Bagley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 5, 1933No. 4 Div. 691PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Thirteen head of cattle, owned by J. A. Prestwood, and found at large in a stock law district, were taken up by Tom Bagley, who claimed damages to crops, etc. Code, § 10216.

Without proceeding to have the damages, costs, and charges ascertained (Code, § 10220), Prestwood brought suit in detinue.

It appears the right of Bagley to detain the cattle was challenged for failure to give notice to the owner within twenty-four hours, as per section 10216.

This contention was not sustained on appeal (Bagley v. Prestwood, 24 Ala. App. 485, 137 So. 313; Id., 223 Ala. 521, 137 So. 314), and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. StoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Bagley v. PrestwoodAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Bagley v. PrestwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Williams v. ColquettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Glover v. PughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Kilgore v. GraceSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  5. Muscogee Motor Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API