Prestwood v. Bagley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Thirteen head of cattle, owned by J. A. Prestwood, and found at large in a stock law district, were taken up by Tom Bagley, who claimed damages to crops, etc. Code, § 10216.
Without proceeding to have the damages, costs, and charges ascertained (Code, § 10220), Prestwood brought suit in detinue.
It appears the right of Bagley to detain the cattle was challenged for failure to give notice to the owner within twenty-four hours, as per section 10216.
This contention was not sustained on appeal (Bagley v. Prestwood, 24 Ala. App. 485, 137 So. 313; Id., 223 Ala. 521, 137 So. 314), and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woodruff v. StoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Bagley v. PrestwoodAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
- Bagley v. PrestwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Williams v. ColquettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Glover v. PughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Kilgore v. GraceSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Muscogee Motor Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.