Legal Opinion
Boris v. Bock Water Heaters, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ralph F. Costello, J.
The case at bar raises the often visited and sometimes problematic issue of the parameters of New York’s long-arm jurisdiction. !
The defendants Bock Water Heaters, Inc., and Perfection Corporation have moved for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) dismissing the complaint and any cross claims against them for lack of personal jurisdiction. The defendant Bock additionally moves for dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and (7) on the grounds that a cause of action has not been stated, and that plaintiffs contractually based claims are barred by the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frank Paterno v. Laser Spine InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Grimaldi v. GuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Boris v. Bock Water Heaters, Inc.New York Supreme Court, Suffolk County · 2004