Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Hawks

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1931No. 1224Published

1Opinion of the Court

KENNAMER, District Judge.

The exhibits to the petition show that Carter et al. filed applications with the boards of county commissioners of Cleveland and MeClain counties for permission to construct a bridge over the South Canadian river and to collect tolls. The board of county commissioners of McClain county on the 22d day of April, 1911, passed a resolution making the grants as prayed for; and the board of county commissioners of Cleveland county on the 16th day of May, 1911, did likewise. The grants in both resolutions are perpetual, subject to such limitations as are by law now or may…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Okmulgee v. Okmulgee Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. State ex rel. Green v. Lawrence Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Virginia Cañon Toll Road Co. v. People ex rel. VivianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Hines v. Scott County Macadamized Road Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. People ex rel. Redemeyer v. Anderson and Ukiah Valley Road Co.California Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API