Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bone v. U.S. Food Service

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 1, 2012No. 27153Published

1DissentJustice Hearn

Respectfully, I dissent. In my opinion, this case involves nothing more than a straight-forward application of Section 1-23-390 of the South Carolina Code (Supp.2011), which permits an appeal from a final decision involving the merits of a substantial issue in a case. Under this rubric, the court of appeals erred in dismissing U.S. Food Service’s appeal. In reaching the opposite result and broadening Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, 387 S.C. 265, 692 S.E.2d 894 (2010), beyond its original context, the majority overrules…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WhittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Green v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Montjoy v. Asten-Hill Dryer FabricsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API