Bone v. U.S. Food Service
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Hearn
Respectfully, I dissent. In my opinion, this case involves nothing more than a straight-forward application of Section 1-23-390 of the South Carolina Code (Supp.2011), which permits an appeal from a final decision involving the merits of a substantial issue in a case. Under this rubric, the court of appeals erred in dismissing U.S. Food Service’s appeal. In reaching the opposite result and broadening Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, 387 S.C. 265, 692 S.E.2d 894 (2010), beyond its original context, the majority overrules…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hunt v. WhittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Green v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Montjoy v. Asten-Hill Dryer FabricsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.