Legal Opinion
Oelkers v. Pendergrast
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 22, 1943No. File No. 6893PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBukr, J.
This action is against Joe Pendergrast only, being tried to the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered against him. From the judgment entered and from the order denying his motion for judgment in his favor, or for a new trial, defendant appeals.
The action was commenced in April, 1940, to recover on two promissory notes, each dated October 9, 1931, and due August 15, 1932. These notes are signed by each of the three defendants — B. Pendergrast being the father of the other defendants.
As security for the payment of the notes, the three defendants executed chattel mortgages on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frankel v. HillierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Stephens v. NeelySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Wilkerson v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
- Hobbs v. Virginia National BankCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
- Clark v. CrouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Napoleon Livestock Auction, Inc. v. RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Schlichenmayer v. LuithleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Union State Bank of Hazen v. Cook (In Re Cook)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1986
- Merwin v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977