Legal Opinion
Bower v. Corbell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 26, 1965No. 40700PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
Plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries. The action was based upon the alleged negligence of defendant, a retail implement dealer, who sold the machine involved to plaintiff’s husband. The issues were heard and determined by a jury in plaintiff’s favor and judgment rendered against defendant who brings this appeal.
The uncontroverted facts disclose that on December 7, 1959, plaintiff’s husband purchased an MBS power saw from defendant. This saw, mounted on bicycle-type wheels, was powered by a 5¾ horsepower gasoline engine. Power was transmitted to a 20-inch…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Ebbert v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Coe v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Ringstad v. I. Magnin & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Fernon D. Marshall v. Ford Motor Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Hudgens v. Cook Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Barnhart v. Freeman Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.