Legal Opinion

Jo Ann Howard & Associates, P.C. v. Cassity

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided November 20, 2015No. Case No. 4:09CV01252 ERWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on PNC Bank’s Motion for New Trial Based on Legal and Evidentiary Errors [ECF No. 2385].

I. STANDARD1

Following a jury trial resulting in an adverse judgment, a party may move for a new trial under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a)(1)(A). Under this Rule, “[a] new trial is appropriate when the first trial, through a verdict -against the weight of the evidence, an excessive damage award, or legal errors at trial, resulted in a miscarriage of justice.” Gray v. Bicknell, 86 F.3d 1472,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Gustafson v. BendaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Diesel MacHinery, Inc. v. B.R. Lee Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. Ralph L. Gray, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. O. Gene Bicknell, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McNamara v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API