Legal Opinion
Hainey v. SAG-AFTRA Health Plan
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 25, 2023No. 8:21-cv-02618Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ROBERT HAINEY, et al., * Plaintiffs, * v. Civil Action No. 8:21-cv-02618-PX * SAG-AFTRA HEALTH PLAN, et al., * Defendants. *** MEMORANDUM OPINION In this ERISA1 case, Defendants the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (“SAG-AFTRA”) Health Plan and the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) for the SAG-AFTRA Health Plan move to dismiss the Amended Complaint and strike the demand for jury trial. ECF No. 18. Plaintiffs Robert and Rosemary Hainey (“the Haineys”) have responded to the motion; they also…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.