Legal Opinion
United States v. McTiernan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 21, 2008No. 07-50430PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant John McTiernan (“Defendant” or “McTiernan”) appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the United States District Court for the Central District of California following a guilty plea to a single-count information charging him with making a false statement to an FBI agent in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Prior to sentencing, McTiernan moved to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming that he had not been informed of his right to seek suppression, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511 and 2515, of an incriminating recording seized by the government.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Frank R. AlberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Juan Gabriel RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Fernando Novelo NostratisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Edward Alan GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. John McTiernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BonillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. EnsmingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ShowalterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.