Legal Opinion

Ranger Insurance Co. v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 10, 2010No. 05-08-01680-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MURPHY.

Ranger Insurance Company, a surety, challenges the assessment of civil trial and appellate filing fees in this bond forfeiture ease, arguing the fees are improper because the nature of the proceeding is criminal. In two issues, Ranger complains about assessment of the fees as well as a claimed overcharge for the sheriffs fee. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The facts in this case are not disputed. In 1999, Ranger executed a $500 appearance bond on behalf of a criminal defendant. The bond was forfeited when the defendant failed to appear in court and the trial court signed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Paulson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. State v. ColyandroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Fox v. Wardy, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
  4. Devine v. Dallas County, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  5. Jeter v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. ECF North Ridge Associates, L.P. v. ORIX Capital Markets, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  2. In the Interest of J.K.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Brian Maurice Fuller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  4. CONTINENTAL HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, AGENT PAT KINNARD, D/B/A PAT KINNARD BAIL BONDS v. the State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2023
  5. CONTINENTAL HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, AGENT PAT KINNARD, D/B/A PAT KINNARD BAIL BONDS v. the State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API