Legal Opinion

Abbey v. Sverdrup Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1996No. 1951510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSTON, Justice.

Kathleen M. Abbey sued Sverdrup Corporation and Sverdrup Technology, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Sverdr-up”). Her claims included a claim alleging a retaliatory refusal to hire. The trial court entered a partial summary judgment for Sverdrup on that claim. Abbey appealed. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed and remanded for further proceedings on that claim. Abbey v. Sverdrup Corp., 692 So.2d 830 (Ala.Civ.App.1996). We granted certio-rari review.

Abbey’s complaint against Sverdrup sought damages based on claims of breach of contract, promissory estoppel,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. King v. Georgia Power CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
  4. Abbey v. Sverdrup Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ferrari v. E-RATE CONSULTING SERVICESDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
  2. International Marine Terminals Partnership v. Port Ship Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Abbey v. Sverdrup CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API