Legal Opinion

People v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions is unpreserved for appellate review, as defense counsel only made a general motion for a trial order of dismissal based upon the People’s alleged failure to make out a prima face case (see CPL 470.05; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-492 [2008]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Medina v. GonyeaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  3. People v. LutchmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API