Legal Opinion
Griffith v. Department of Business Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 26, 1993No. 92-648PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BASKIN, Judge.
Dr. Thomas A. Griffith, a veterinarian, appeals a Final Order of the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, Department of Business Regulation [Division]. We affirm.
The Division sought to revoke Dr. Griffith’s Pari-Mutuel Wagering Occupational License.1 The Division brought an administrative complaint against Dr. Griffith, asserting that he violated Florida Administrative Code Rule 7E-1.006(16),2 by bringing *931an unapproved drug, or causing that drug to be brought onto a pari-mutuel facility. The complaint stated that Dr. Griffith provided Yentipulman, an equine medication which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonald v. Dept. of Banking and FinanceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- PUBLIC EMPLOYEES REL. v. Dade County PoliceSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Cohen v. School Bd. of Dade County, Fla.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Maclen Rehabilitation Center v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Autoworld of America Corp. v. Department of Highway SafetyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Spiral Tech Elem. Charter Sch. v. Sch. Bd. of Miami-Dade Cty.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Pusey v. West Hialeah Gardens Elementary SchoolDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Yewande Smith v. Miami-Dade County School BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025