Legal Opinion

Lori Sileven v. Cox Automotive Corporate Services, LLC

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 14, 2022No. 5:21-cv-02035Unknown

1Opinion

Case 5:21-cv-02035-JWH-KK Document 19 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:244 J S - 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LORI SILEVEN, Case No. 5:21-cv-02035-JWH-KKx 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION TO REMAND [ECF NO. 13] 14 MANHEIM REMARKETING, INC., a California Corporation; 15 COX AUTOMOTIVE, INC., a Georgia Corporation; 16 HEIDI YUNGBLOOD, an individual; and 17 DOES 1 through 30, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 5:21-cv-02035-JWH-KK Document 19 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 10 Page ID…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API