Legal Opinion

Alexas v. Post & Flagg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 7, 1924No. 11537PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was. delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action for $2,375 damages alleged to have been sustained through the failure of the defendants to carry out the plaintiff’s instructions with reference to the sale of corn for future delivery on the Chicago Board of Trade.

The facts are as follows :

On July 9, 1920, the plaintiff, Alexas, living at Greenwood, S. C., wired the defendants, Post & Flagg, brokers, doing business in the City of New York: “Sell 5 Dec. Corn stop' loss 144.” It is conceded that the first part of the telegram was an order for the defendants to sell for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fairly v. Wappoo MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  2. Campbell v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Richter v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  4. Martin v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  5. Policastro v. Charles S. Sprague Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Julius Kayser & Co. v. Textron, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  2. Cato v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API