Legal Opinion

State, City of St. Cloud v. Voigt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1986No. C1-85-2228PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Respondents Michael and Candace Voigt were each charged with two violations of the City of St. Cloud Zoning Ordinance. One of the charges was subsequently dropped. The trial court dismissed the remaining charges in the interest of justice on the condition that the Voigts comply with the zoning ordinance for one year. The City of St. Cloud appeals. We dismiss the City’s appeal.

FACTS

The Voigts own a nonconforming duplex in the City of St. Cloud.

The City charged Candace and Michael Voigt in separate complaints with two violations of the City of St. Cloud Zoning Ordinance.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of St. Paul v. LandrevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. City of St. Paul v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. In Re the Welfare of J.H.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of West St. Paul v. BanningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API