Ellerman v. New Orleans, etc., R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
The counsel for Ellerman, the plaintiff, as one reason why this court should not dissolve the injunction issued by the state court, says that the case has not been in fact removed to this court, and therefore we are without jurisdiction to entertain the motion. This preliminary question must therefore be first disposed of.
The first reason assigned by counsel for plaintiff why the case is not properly before this court is, because an order for removal was necessary to be made by the state court, and being made, was superseded by the suspensive appeal to the supreme court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bryant v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Stevens v. . the Phoenix Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Darst v. BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Whiton v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Bell v. . DixNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. EllermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Greene v. KlingerUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
- Fournet v. De v. LbissSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Dunn v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- New Orleans City Railroad v. Crescent City RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881