Seabury v. Grosvenor
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
[This was a bill by George J. Seabury and Robert W. Johnson against John M. Gros-venor to restrain the infringement of a trademark.]
1Opinion of the Court
BLATCHFORD, District Judge.
The evidence is clear that the plaintiffs were systematically and knowingly carrying on a fraudulent trade. Although they may have omitted the fraudulent and deceptive and untrue language irom their circulars before this suit was commenced, yet if they have any property in the trade-mark which they claim the title to, they acquired such property by the use. for a considerable time, of such language in the circulars which accompanied the articles they sold, and in respect of which the trade-mark is claimed. Such language was to the effect, that a celebrated chemist…
2Cited by8 opinions
- United States Light & Heating Co. of Maine v. United States Light & Heating Co. of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
- Hilson Co. v. FosterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897
- Best Foods, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- Cleveland Stone Co. v. WallaceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1892
- Alden v. GrossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.