Legal Opinion

Eady v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 23, 2019No. 3D18-2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Cox v. State, 221 So.3d 723, 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (holding: "Unlike a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to rule 3.800(a) places the burden upon the defendant ... to affirmatively identify court records which, on their face, demonstrate the existence of an illegal sentence or an entitlement to relief under rule 3.800(a)"); Llerena v. State, 953 So.2d 31, 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (noting: "Concurrent sentences do not necessarily begin at the same time, and unless they are ordered to be coterminous, they will…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Llerena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Knight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James Toussaint v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  2. LUIS HERNANDEZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API