Clare Development Corporation v. First National Bank of Columbus, Georgia
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, Justice.
The appellants sued, the bank for injunctive relief and damages for fraud arising out of the alleged breach of an agreement to make construction loans and wrongful foreclosure of property securing loans. Injunctive relief was denied and the bank’s motion for summary judgment was granted.
The case oí Beasley v. Ponder, 143 Ga. App. 810 (240 SE2d 111) (1977), is directly in point. There the court said: "The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to the defendant. Although fraud can be predicated on a misrepresentation as to a future event where the defendant knows…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beasley v. PonderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidator for the Hamilton National Bank of Chattanooga v. Lattimore Land CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Simpson Consulting, Inc. v. Barclays Bank PLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Sierra Associates, Ltd. v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- John Bleakley Ford, Inc. v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Phillips v. Liberty T. v. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.