Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Meacham v. Preston
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1932No. 23132PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
This is an action in quo warranto brought by Cameron Meacham, prosecuting attorney of Scioto county, Ohio, on behalf of the state of Ohio, against George Preston, William Groh, John B. Lee, Fred Bihl and Fred Bobst. The section of the General Code involved in this case, Section 4736, reads as follows :
“The county board of education may create a school district from one or more school districts or parts thereof, and in so doing shall make an equitable division of the funds or indebtedness between the newly created district and any districts from which any portion of such newly created district…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Wheeler School District No. 152 v. HawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Peninsular Telephone Co. v. Marks, Et VirSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Gigandet v. BrewerOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- City of New Port Richey v. State ex rel. O'MalleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962