Legal Opinion

Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v. Scricca

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wallace R. Cotton, J.

Defendant’s motion, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (3) and (7), to dismiss the instant forfeiture action brought by the plaintiff Property Clerk, New York City Police Department (Property Clerk) is denied.

*434On June 3, 1987, police officers allegedly observed one Thomas Cotogna purchase a controlled substance in a park located in Queens. Subsequent to the aforesaid purchase, Cotogna entered an automobile owned by the defendant and drove away. However, he was quickly arrested by police officers for possession of a controlled substance (Penal Law § 220.03).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v. SerodaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Property Clerk v. PaganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v. CovellNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Property Clerk of New York City Police Department v. MolomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API