Legal Opinion

Prosper Energy Corp. v. Industrial Commission

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1984No. Civ. 10666-10670PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Prosper Energy Corporation, 1 Bison Operating Company, and Monsanto Oil Company (working interest owners, managers, or operators of oil and gas properties unitized pursuant to §§ 38-08-09.1 through 38-08-09.16, NDCC, hereafter collectively referred to as the Operators) have appealed from a district court judgment dismissing, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, five appeals from orders of the Industrial Commission of North Dakota (the Commission). We affirm.

The properties involved were unitized in the late 1960’s for purposes of management, operation, and further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagner v. North Dakota Board of Barber ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of Casselton v. North Dakota Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Happy Day Day Care Center v. Social Service Board of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hayden v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Boyko v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. J.P. Lamb Land Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Basin Elec. Power Co-Op. v. ND WORKERS COMP. BUREAUNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API