Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Porter

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 1, 1937No. 14PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents a question as to the meaning and applicability of section 303 (a) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 72), as amended by the Revenue Act of 1932, § 805 (47 Stat. 280), which permits to be deducted from the gross estate in computing the net taxable estate claims against the estate founded upon a promise or agreement “to the extent that they were contracted bona fide and for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth.”

For several years prior to his death on November 29, 1932, Alexander J. Porter had guaranteed in various amounts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Porter v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. Latty v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  4. Carney v. BenzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Bank of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Estate of ThurstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Estate of Pollard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  5. Estate of Lazar v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API