Commonwealth v. Potosnak
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
This is a direct appeal from the Order denying Appellant’s Motion to Quash Information on grounds of double jeopardy. After a complete review of the record and argument advanced by Appellant, we affirm.
Appellant was charged with Burglary, 1 Criminal Attempt, 2 Rape, 3 Indecent Assault, 4 Aggravated Assault 5 and Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse. 6 Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant pled guilty to each of the foregoing charges, with the sole exception of Rape. The trial judge accepted the plea. The plea agreement provided that, in return for the guilty plea, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ZuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. ColesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. AreltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. StarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.