Legal Opinion

State v. Arceo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1996No. 16950Published

1Opinion of the Court

928 P.2d 843 (1996)

84 Hawai`i 1

STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Anthony ARCEO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16950.

Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

November 18, 1996.

Carolyn Burton of Parton & Burton, on the briefs, Wailuku, for defendant-appellant Anthony Arceo.

Robert K. Kekuna, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, on the briefs, Wailuku, for plaintiff-appellee State of Hawai`i.

Before MOON, C.J., and KLEIN, LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA and RAMIL, JJ.

LEVINSON, Justice.

Following a jury trial, the defendant-appellant Anthony Arceo was found guilty as charged of committing one count of sexual assault in the third degree…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API