Long v. Daly

Pee Curiam.

Of the nine points noticed in the per curiam of the Supreme Court, only two are made here; and they are the first two mentioned by the court below.

As to the clause in the charge which reads in part: "Being in violation of * * * of the Manual of Eules,” &c., we are content to rest substantially on the reasoning of the Supreme Court, which plainly was of the opinion that the clause in question should properly be disregarded as surplusage. The case of Kelly v. Bishop, 119 Atl. Rep. 6, decided in the Supreme Court by the late Mr. Justice Bergen sitting alone, is not controlling on us…