Pinkussohn v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
We are convinced that the evidence was ample to sustain the finding of guilt. The confession -was not disputed and was strongly supported by corroborative and circumstantial evidence. The corpus delicti was established by evidence other than the confession. Jordan v. U.S. (C.C.A.) 60 F.(2d) 4; Bolland v. U. S. (C.C.A.) 238 F. 529; Berryman v. U. S. (C.C.A.) 259 F. 208.
The facts did not permit of any inference of innocent intent. They point irresistibly to the presence of a criminal intent to violate the statute by making, possessing, and disposing of large numbers of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jordan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Berryman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Bolland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
- Rosenwinkel v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael Campodonico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955