Legal Opinion

Pinkussohn v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 26, 1937No. 5911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

We are convinced that the evidence was ample to sustain the finding of guilt. The confession -was not disputed and was strongly supported by corroborative and circumstantial evidence. The corpus delicti was established by evidence other than the confession. Jordan v. U.S. (C.C.A.) 60 F.(2d) 4; Bolland v. U. S. (C.C.A.) 238 F. 529; Berryman v. U. S. (C.C.A.) 259 F. 208.

The facts did not permit of any inference of innocent intent. They point irresistibly to the presence of a criminal intent to violate the statute by making, possessing, and disposing of large numbers of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  2. Berryman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. Bolland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
  4. Rosenwinkel v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  5. Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael Campodonico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API