Brooks v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, Presiding Judge
Claude Dale Brooks (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing. Because Movant’s pro se Rule 29.15 motion was untimely filed, we vacate the motion court’s judgment and remand the cause with directions to dismiss Movant’s motion.
*444I. BACKGROUND
In August 2011, Movant was charged by complaint with second-degree robbery. Movant’s trial counsel then filed a motion for a bench trial, and a bench trial was held on October 30, 2012. The trial court subsequently entered a verdict and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- State of Missouri v. Claude Dale BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- BRIAN GREEN, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Michael Greenleaf v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- BRIAN L. MCDANIEL v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- GABRIEL A. PULLIAM, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- KENNETH STEWART v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- KENNETH STEWART v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Terron D. Pool v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021