Legal Opinion

SL Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 18, 1999No. 19-5134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

The Federal Communications Commission disqualified appellant Dorothy 0. Schulze and Deborah Brigham (“S&B”) from a comparative television licensing proceeding due to serious misconduct. Because no other qualified applicant remained, S&B proposed to “settle” the proceeding by substituting in its place appellant SL Communications (“SL”), an established, reputable broadcaster willing to reimburse S&B for the expenses it incurred pursuing the license. Relying on its policy of deterring misconduct, the Commission rejected the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams Enterprises, Inc., a Division of Williams Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Serafyn v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rossello Ex Rel. Rossello v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  2. Contemporary Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API