Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 2, 2005No. 3983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Derringer L. Young was charged with possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, and kidnapping. He pled guilty to the possession charge, and a jury convicted him of kidnapping, and of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature as a lesser included offense of criminal sexual conduct. On appeal, Young argues (1) the trial judge erred by admitting evidence of his prior convictions for criminal sexual conduct and criminal domestic violence, and (2) the State improperly injected race as a motive. We affirm.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. AlbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. PlathSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Floyd v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. PageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. CulbreathCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API