Legal Opinion

Vickers v. Electrozone Commercial Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 25, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On contract. Oj'er and demurrer to the declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

*11The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, Chief Justice.

The eleetrozone company, a corporation created by the laws of Few York, controlled a United States patent and certain trademarks for manufacturing what is known as eleetrozone and medetrina. The company, on the 24th of September, 1897, entered into a contract under seal with William A. Mears, of Philadelphia, and William H. Hibbard, of Buffalo, parties of the second part, and Albert Woolf, of the city of Few York, of the third part. The contract was signed by the eleetrozone company, and also by Woolf, Mears and Hibbard. This…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Murray v. Edes Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. De Jianne v. Citizens' Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. Holler v. RossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  4. Newark Trust Co. v. CurtissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  5. Yarborough v. HarkeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API