Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Friedman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 4, 1968No. P68/467; protests 313448-K, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/468; protests 316993-K, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/469; protests 321762-K, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/470; protests 59/27136, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/471; protests 64/8027, etc. (Philadelphia)Published

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bulrush, corn husk, or maize baskets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Carson M. Simon & Co. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558) and Morris Friedman v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 456, C.D. 3019), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simon v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API