State v. Bullock
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Judge.
*73 After remand by our Supreme Court, Michael Antonio Bullock ("Defendant") has two issues to be considered on appeal. Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because his consent to search the rental car he was driving was not voluntary due to the stop's excessive scope and duration. Specifically, Defendant argues the stop was prolonged because of questioning by Officer John McDonough ("Officer McDonough") and due to the delay in waiting for a second officer. Defendant also argues that the trial court committed prejudicial error by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. ChukwuCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.