Legal Opinion

Wachovia Mortgage Co. v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1976No. 51193PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

The trial judge’s discretion when exercised in confirmation of judicial sales must be "sound legal discretion.” Hall v. Taylor, 133 Ga. 606 (66 SE 478); Wingfield v. Bennett, 36 Ga. App. 27 (134 SE 840). The denial of confirmation — on the ground that the sale to the mortgagee failed to bring the true market value of the land as required by Code Ann. § 67-1504 (Ga. L. 1935, p. 381) — was an abuse of discretion in this case.

"As a general rule the price brought at a public sale, after proper and lawful advertisement, is prima facie the market value of the property sold, absent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Giordano v. StubbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Thompson v. MasliaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Central Georgia Power Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Hall v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Wingfield v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tower Financial Services, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Wheeler v. Coastal BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Ivey-Matherly Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. McCain v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Smith v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API