Legal Opinion

Lundstrom v. Young

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 27, 2022No. 3:18-cv-02856Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN LUNDSTROM, Case No.: 18-cv-2856-GPC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT 13 v. YOUNG’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 14 CARLA YOUNG, an individual; LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; 15 [ECF No. 113] LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 16 401(k) PLAN; and DOES 1 through 20, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court is Defendant Young’s (“Defendant” or “Young”) Motion for 20 Sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. 21 ECF No. 113. Plaintiff Brian Lundstrom (“Plaintiff” or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. In Re: Keegan Management Co., Securities Litigation. Michael Moore, and Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann Elizabeth J. Cabraser v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware Corporation, Michael Moore, and Richard L. Jaeger Feldman, Waldman & Kline v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Sally Conforte v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph Conforte v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Estate of John Marvin Blas, Through Mildred Chargualaf, Personal Representative, and Mark E. Griffin, Guam Legal Services Corp. v. Paul Winkler, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API