Ramer v. Evangeline Maid Bakery

1H concur in the result reached by the majority for the following reasons.

The plaintiff claims that vents in the building roof were defective because they contained openings that permitted water to enter the building during rain events. Although the plaintiff presented evidence of these alleged defects, he presented no evidence that it rained on or around the day of the accident. Thus, the plaintiff *294failed to establish that he would be able to meet his burden of proving at trial that the allegedly defective vents were a cause-in-fact of the accident. When the undisputed facts disclose that…