Legal Opinion

Doe v. Smith

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 8, 1998No. 98-CV-6600 (ARR)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER

ROSS, District Judge.

Plaintiff alleges that, in the course of providing the plaintiff with psychiatric treatment, the defendant assaulted, molested, and sexually abused the plaintiff. As a result of the sensitive nature of the subject matter of the case, the plaintiff moved the court either to allow her to proceed under a pseudonym or to seal all documents filed in the action. The defendant opposed the motion. For the reasons stated below, the court denies the motion.

I. Background

According to both parties, the plaintiff initially engaged the defendant as her…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Doe v. StegallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. 20 Fair empl.prac.cas. 457, 20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,136 Southern Methodist University Association of Women Law Students, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Wynne & Jaffe, Southern Methodist University Association of Women Law Students, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Thompson, Knight, Simmons & BullionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. EW v. New York Blood CenterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  2. Doe v. BriscoeVirginia Circuit Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API