Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bryant Avenue Tenants' Ass'n v. Koch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 1987Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kupferman, J. P., and Ross, J.,

dissent in part in a memorandum by Kupferman, J. P., as follows: There is impliedly asserted a claim pursuant to the Civil Rights Act (42 USC § 1983) to the effect that plaintiffs were deprived of due *475process by failure of adequate notice and opportunity to be heard in connection with capital improvement rent increases and the authorization of loans to the landlord under article 8-A of the Public Housing Finance Law. The court at Special Term seemingly sustained such a cause of action, ahd so it should be dealt with.

We have heretofore determined that the type of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. 423 South Salina Street, Inc. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. De Luise v. GliedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API