Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodman

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 5, 1969No. 22,078; No. 22,095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The appellants, Rodman and Schnei-dewind, were tried jointly for absence without leave, escape from confinement, larceny, i'obbery, and aggravated assault, in violation of Articles 86, 95, 121, 122, and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886, 895, 921, 922, and 928, respectively. On their pleas, they were found guilty and given sentences that included dishonorable discharges, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor. Identical grants of review on whether the law officer prej-udicially erred by granting trial *103counsel’s motion to amend the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spencer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. SquirrellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. KrutsingerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  5. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1976
  2. United States v. CorpacU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  3. United States v. LewisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API